4.3 Article

Spectrally based bathymetric mapping of a dynamic, sand-bedded channel: Niobrara River, Nebraska, USA

Journal

RIVER RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS
Volume 34, Issue 5, Pages 430-441

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/rra.3270

Keywords

bathymetry; depth retrieval; hyperspectral; remote sensing; sand-bed river

Funding

  1. Office of Naval Research [N000141010873]
  2. Geological Society of America

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Methods for spectrally based mapping of river bathymetry have been developed and tested in clear-flowing, gravel-bed channels, with limited application to turbid, sand-bed rivers. This study used hyperspectral images and field surveys from the dynamic, sandy Niobrara River to evaluate three depth retrieval methods. The first regression-based approach, optimal band ratio analysis (OBRA), paired in situ depth measurements with image pixel values to estimate depth. The second approach used ground-based field spectra to calibrate an OBRA relationship. The third technique, image-to-depth quantile transformation (IDQT), estimated depth by linking the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of depth to the CDF of an image-derived variable. OBRA yielded the lowest depth retrieval mean error (0.005m) and highest observed versus predicted R-2 (0.817). Although misalignment between field and image data did not compromise the performance of OBRA in this study, poor georeferencing could limit regression-based approaches such as OBRA in dynamic, sand-bedded rivers. Field spectroscopy-based depth maps exhibited a mean error with a slight shallow bias (0.068m) but provided reliable estimates for most of the study reach. IDQT had a strong deep bias but provided informative relative depth maps. Overprediction of depth by IDQT highlights the need for an unbiased sampling strategy to define the depth CDF. Although each of the techniques we tested demonstrated potential to provide accurate depth estimates in sand-bed rivers, each method also was subject to certain constraints and limitations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available