3.9 Article

ACTIVITY OF RHIZOSPHERE SOIL MICROORGANISMS OF SUGARCANE CULTIVARS AFTER SPRAYING OF HERBICIDES: DIURON, TEBUTHIURON, AMETRYN AND DIURON plus HEXAZINONE

Journal

REVISTA CAATINGA
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages 593-601

Publisher

UNIV FED RURAL SEMI-ARIDO-UFERSA
DOI: 10.1590/1983-21252018v31n307rc

Keywords

Rhizosphere; Soil microorganisms; Residual effect

Categories

Funding

  1. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)
  2. Foundation for Research Support of the State of Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG)
  3. Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Changes in the agricultural environment can be determined by providing microbiological indicators of the soil since the soil microorganisms are sensitive to variations in the environment. In this way, the impact of herbicides of long residual effect on the rhizospheric soil microorganisms of sugarcane cultivars was evaluated. The cultivars of sugarcane (SP 81-3250 and RB 867515) were treated with four herbicides (tebuthiuron, diuron, ametryn and mixture of diuron + and hexazinone) applied in pre-emergence. The herbicides were applied seven days after the planting of the gems. At 30, 60 and 90 days after the application, the soil rhizosphere was collected in each treatment to determine the CO2 evolution of the soil (C-CO2), microbial biomass carbon (MBC), metabolic quotient (qCO2), solubility potential of inorganic phosphorus P (PSFI) and percentage of roots colonized by mycorrhizal fungi Arbuscular. No changes were observed in the microbial activity of the sugarcane rhizosphere at 30 days after application of the herbicides (DAA). However, at 90 DAA, all herbicides negatively affected the activity of the rhizospheric microorganisms of sugarcane. The metabolic activity of rhizosphere in soil cultivated with RB 867515 was less affected by herbicides.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available