4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Tests of a full-scale ITER toroidal interferometer and polarimeter (TIP) prototype on the DIII-D tokamak (invited)

Journal

REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS
Volume 89, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.5037461

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. DOE [DE-AC-02-09CH11466, DE-FC02-04ER54698]
  2. PPPL Prime [DEAC-02-09CH11466]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A full-scale ITER toroidal interferometer and polarimeter (TIP) prototype, including an active feedback alignment system, has been installed and tested on the DIII-D tokamak. In the TIP prototype, a two-color interferometry measurement of line-integrated density is carried out at 10.59 mu m and 5.22 mu m using a CO2 and quantum cascade laser, respectively, while a separate polarimetry measurement of the plasma-induced Faraday effect is made at 10.59 mu m. The TIP prototype is equipped with a piezo tip/tilt stage active feedback alignment system that minimizes noise in the measurement and keeps the diagnostic aligned throughout DIII-D discharges. The measured phase resolution for the polarimeter and interferometer is 0.05 degrees (100 Hz bandwidth) and 1.9 degrees (1 kHz bandwidth), respectively. The corresponding line-integrated density resolution for the vibration-compensated interferometer is delta nL = 1.5 x 10(18) m(-2), and the magnetic field-weighted line-integrated density from the polarimeter is delta nBL = 1.5 x 10(19) Tm-2. Both interferometer and polarimeter measurements during DIII-D discharges compare well with the expectations based on calculations using Thomson scattering measured density profiles and magnetic equilibrium reconstructions. Additionally, larger bandwidth interferometer measurements show that the diagnostic is a sensitive monitor of core density fluctuations with demonstrated measurements of Alfven eigenmodes and tearing modes. Published by AIP Publishing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available