4.7 Article

Analysis of the efficacy and feasibility of recycling PVC sashes in Japan

Journal

RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING
Volume 131, Issue -, Pages 41-53

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.12.003

Keywords

PVC sash; Recycling; Life cycle assessment; CO2; Recycling system

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Currently, PVC sashes are used widely in Europe, where they are recycled when discarded, in an effort to reduce landfill volumes and reduce environmental impact. In Japan, PVC sashes became popular in the 1980s, mainly in Hokkaido, but a structure for recycling used PVC sashes has not been established. This paper researches a PVC sash recycling system in Japan, and assesses the efficacy of the system in Hokkaido on environmental impact reduction, as well as its economic feasibility. Based on the result of these assessments, the efficacy of future PVC sash recycling systems on environmental impact and its economic feasibility was discussed. An inventory analysis on the environmental impact assessment showed that the CO2 emissions from PVC sash recycling in Hokkaido, for manual secondary separation in recycling plants, reaches 233 kg-CO2/ton. For machine separation, it varies between 288-380 kg-CO2/ton. As for the economic feasibility of PVC sash recycling, if the secondary separation is carried out manually, the feasibility is low. On the other hand, if machine separation is adopted, labor costs are low and revenue increases. Therefore, it was found that, even if PVC sashes are collected from relatively distant locations, it is economically feasible. From the above, this research demonstrated that it is possible to reduce CO2 emissions through PVC sash recycling. In addition, it was shown that the economic feasibility of the PVC sash recycling system is low if its separation process is done manually, but it becomes feasible if automated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available