4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Control of selectivity in methane conversion reactions in RF plasma: the influence of reaction conditions

Journal

RESEARCH ON CHEMICAL INTERMEDIATES
Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages 3761-3771

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11164-018-3380-6

Keywords

RF plasma; Plasma excitation; Methane; Partial oxidation; Carbon monoxide; Acetylene

Funding

  1. C1 Gas Refinery Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning [2015M3D3A1A01064899]
  2. Ajou university research fund
  3. Human Resources Development of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) grant - Korea government Ministry of Trade, industry and Energy [20154010200820]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

RF plasma excitation of methane has been studied in an effort to optimize the reaction conditions for a selective partial oxidation of methane. The reaction products of RF-excited methane are C2 hydrocarbons such as ethane and acetylene when O-2 is not used. The introduction of a few percent of O-2, however, is found to switch the selectivity in favor of CO while CO2 formation is suppressed down to a level below a few percent. Interestingly, in the low O-2 ratio regime (0-0.6), the selectivity between CO and C2 hydrocarbons is observed to vary systematically in response to the detailed reaction conditions, including flow rate, pressure and applied RF power, which are explained by the competition between coupling and partial oxidation reactions. Variation in the density and the residence time of the active species in the plasma is suggested to determine the overall reaction pathways. The present results suggest a possibility of a selective production of the partial oxidation products of methane such as CO with a high selectivity and a high conversion efficiency using controlled RF plasma from methane and O-2.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available