4.7 Article

Effect of cell size in metal foam inserted to the air channel of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell for high performance

Journal

RENEWABLE ENERGY
Volume 115, Issue -, Pages 663-675

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2017.08.085

Keywords

Polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell; High performance PEMFC; Flow field; Metal foam; Performance improvement

Funding

  1. Institute of Advanced Machinery and Design (IAMD) of Seoul National University
  2. BK plus
  3. World Class University (WCU) program through the Korea Research Foundation [R31-2008-000-10083-0]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea - Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning [2016R1A2A1A05005510]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, metal foam insert was suggested as a novel flow path for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell to improve the performance of fuel cell. For the experimental works in this study, four types of metal foams which have different cell size were used, and performance and characteristics of fuel cell with each metal foam were investigated by several methods. As a result, we found that the maximum power of fuel cell was increased about 50.6% by using proper metal foam compared to the conventional fuel cell with serpentine flow filed. We could also suggest a new flow path made by two metal foams which have different cell sizes. The mixed metal foam was made by combining the metal foam with large contact surface area to the upstream location of flow field and the metal foam with large diffusion area to the downstream location. Eventually, we could get about 60.1% of maximum power increase with this mixed metal foam as a flow path. Finally, the results obtained in this study can suggest a new flow path of PEMFC for improved performance and give a new concept of dividing flow field to make fuel cell operate more effectively. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available