4.8 Review

Anaerobic co-digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW): Progress and challenges

Journal

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
Volume 93, Issue -, Pages 380-399

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.051

Keywords

Anaerobic; Co-digestion; OFMSW; Sewage; Sludge; Biogas; Methane; Hydrogen

Funding

  1. Singapore National Research Foundation
  2. Department of Biotechnology-GoI [BT/RLF/Re-entry/12/ 2016]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness [CTM2016-79071-R]
  4. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [CTM2010-17654]
  5. Spanish State Research Agency (Agencia Estatal de Investigacion - AEI)
  6. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)
  7. Agri-food Campus of International Excellence (ceiA3) [E-11-2013-0076119]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Anaerobic digestion (AD) of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) offers the possibility of a clean and renewable energy source - i.e. biogas. However, OFMSW lacks certain characteristics that may limit its efficacy as such a resource. Bio-resources such as sewage sludge and animal wastes have these characteristics and so may be used to enhance OFMSW's digestion. Anaerobic co-digestion (AcoD) of OFMSW with sewage sludge has been extensively studied and applied successfully at full-scale. Pre-treatments can increase substrate biodegradability and so biogas yield, but these may need further investigation to determine economic viability. Mathematical modeling has been shown useful in aiding selection of appropriate combinations of substrates and pretreatment for co-digestion (e.g. substrate type and mix ratio). This review also considers the fate of the digestate following such anaerobic co-digestion. The difficulties in implementation of the co-digestion approach need not necessarily be technical in nature but can be due to management issues.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available