4.7 Article

Utilizing experimental degradation data for warranty cost optimization under imperfect repair

Journal

RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY
Volume 177, Issue -, Pages 108-119

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2018.05.002

Keywords

Continuous degradation; Cost optimization; Estimation uncertainty; Imperfect repair; Renewal process; Warranty policy

Funding

  1. Research Grants Council of Hong Kong [T32-101/15-R]
  2. GRF [CityU 11203815]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71532008]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Manufacturers usually want to predict the warranty cost for new products under affordable maintenance policies. With insufficient reliability information, experimental degradation tests are commonly conducted to predict the field reliability before the products are put on the market. In this paper, we propose a novel warranty cost optimization framework based on degradation data within a finite warranty period under the assumption of imperfect repairs. The expected number of warranty claims is given in the analytical form. Two sources of uncertainty are considered to estimate the field reliability for more realistic warranty cost prediction: the uncertainty in experimental data and the variation in field conditions. Effects of imperfect repairs are assumed to be random. The warranty cost for a single repair is assumed to be associated with the improvement factor of imperfect repairs. Optimal imperfect repair policy is obtained by minimizing the expected warranty cost for each sold product. Further, the proposed framework can facilitate the interval prediction for warranty cost. Numerical results show that the proposed analytical method to evaluate warranty claims significantly outperforms simulation methods from the perspective of computational efforts. Finally, an application example of degradation tests along with sensitivity analysis is presented to illustrate the proposed framework.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available