4.4 Article

Assessment of tobacco heating product THP1.0. Part 5: In vitro dosimetric and cytotoxic assessment

Journal

REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 93, Issue -, Pages 52-61

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.09.016

Keywords

In vitro cytotoxicity; Nicotine; Dosimetry; RM2OS; Neutral Red Uptake; Tobacco heating products

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tobacco heating products (THPs) represent a subset of the next-generation nicotine and tobacco product category, in which tobacco is typically heated at temperatures of 250-350 degrees C, thereby avoiding many of the harmful combustion-related toxicant emissions of conventional cigarettes. In this study, we have assessed aerosol generation and cytotoxicity from two commercially available THPs, THP1.0 and THS, relative to tobacco smoke from 3R4F reference cigarettes, using an adapted Borgwaldt RM2OS Smoking Machine. Quantification of nicotine in the exposed cell-culture media showed greater delivery of nicotine from both THPs than from the cigarette. Using Neutral Red Uptake assay, THPs demonstrated reduced in vitro cytotoxicity in H292 human bronchial epithelial cells as compared with 3R4F cigarette exposure at the air-liquid interface (p < 0.0001). Both THPs demonstrated a statistically similar reduction in biological response, with >87% viability relative to 3R4F at a common aerosol dilution (1:40, aerosol:air). A similar response was observed when plotted against nicotine; a statistical difference between 3R4F and THPs (p < 0.0001) and no difference between the THPs (p = 0.0186). This pre-clinical in vitro biological testing forms part of a larger package of data to help assess the safety and risk reduction potential of next-generation tobacco products relative to cigarettes, using a weight of evidence approach. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available