4.7 Article

Refinement of SMOS Multiangular Brightness Temperature Toward Soil Moisture Retrieval and Its Analysis Over Reference Targets

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSTARS.2014.2336664

Keywords

Brightness temperature; intercomparison; soil moisture; soil moisture ocean salinity (SMOS); WindSat

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41301396]
  2. CAS/SAFEA International Partnership Program for Creative Research Teams [KZZD-EW-TZ-09]
  3. French National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS)
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Soil moisture ocean salinity (SMOS) mission has been providing L-band multiangular brightness temperature observations at a global scale since its launch in November 2009 and has performed well in the retrieval of soil moisture. The multiple incidence angle observations also allow for the retrieval of additional parameters beyond soil moisture, but these are not obtained at fixed values and the resolution and accuracy change with the grid locations over SMOS snapshot images. Radio-frequency interference (RFI) issues and aliasing at lower look angles increase the uncertainty of observations and thereby affect the soil moisture retrieval that utilizes observations at specific angles. In this study, we proposed a two-step regression approach that uses a mixed objective function based on SMOS L1c data products to refine characteristics of multiangular observations. The approach was found to be robust by validation using simulations from a radiative transfer model, and valuable in improving soil moisture estimates from SMOS. In addition, refined brightness temperatures were analyzed over three external targets: Antarctic ice sheet, Amazon rainforest, and Sahara desert, by comparing with WindSat observations. These results provide insights for selecting and utilizing external targets as part of the upcoming soil moisture active passive (SMAP) mission.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available