4.7 Article

Inverse Retrieval of Chlorophyll From Reflected Spectra for Assimilating Branches of Drought-Tolerant Tamarix ramosissima

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSTARS.2015.2419225

Keywords

Calibration; chlorophyll; inversion; PROSPECT; Tamarix ramosissima

Funding

  1. 973 Program [2012CB956204]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41371364]
  3. CAS project [1074041001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Leaf chlorophyll content is a critical indicator for the better understanding of the featured carbon cycle and ecosystem functions in arid regions. The potential applicability of the inverse retrieval of chlorophyll via the radiative transfer model PROSPECT has been intensively examined in this study for a dominant species in desert ecosystems, Tamarix ramosissima, in central Asia, which has distinct structural features of xeromorphism and its young twig functioned as assimilating organisms. This study revealed that the performance of the inverse retrieval based on the original version of PROSPECT-4 was poor with very low accuracy. As a comparison, its calibrated version was capable of accurate retrieval of chlorophyll content, which recorded an R-2 (coefficient of determination) of 0.47 with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 28.79 mg/m(2), over the entire measured chlorophyll range, from 57.37 to 202.27 mg/m(2). The model calibration is not considered to be overfitting since the tenfold cross-validation shows a close RMSE value of 26.19 mg/m(2). The effects of the percentage of training dataset for calibration and the number of calibration repeats have also been intensively investigated in this study. Despite some inherent defects of applying broadleaf-oriented PROSPECT on assimilating branches, it remains a feasible selection to inversely retrieve the chlorophyll content from the reflectance and thus provides a base for investigating the chlorophyll content of desert plants using hyperspectral remote sensing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available