4.4 Article

Preliminary assessment of stable nitrogen and oxygen isotopic composition of USGS51 and USGS52 nitrous oxide reference gases and perspectives on calibration needs

Journal

RAPID COMMUNICATIONS IN MASS SPECTROMETRY
Volume 32, Issue 15, Pages 1207-1214

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/rcm.8157

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Department of Energy Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center [DE-SC0018409, BER DE-FC02]
  2. European Metrology Programme for Innovation and Research [16ENV06]
  3. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [17H06105]
  4. National Science Foundation Earth Sciences Instrumentation and Facilities [1456430]
  5. National Science Foundation Geobiology and Low Temperature Geochemistry [1630399]
  6. Division Of Earth Sciences
  7. Directorate For Geosciences [1456430, 1630399] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

RationaleDespite a long history and growing interest in isotopic analyses of N2O, there is a lack of isotopically characterized N2O isotopic reference materials (standards) to enable normalization and reporting of isotope-delta values. Here we report the isotopic characterization of two pure N2O gas reference materials, USGS51 and USGS52, which are now available for laboratory calibration (). MethodsA total of 400 sealed borosilicate glass tubes of each N2O reference gas were prepared from a single gas filling of a high vacuum line. We demonstrated isotopic homogeneity via dual-inlet isotope-ratio mass spectrometry. Isotopic analyses of these reference materials were obtained from eight laboratories to evaluate interlaboratory variation and provide preliminary isotopic characterization of their N-15, O-18, N-15, N-15 and site preference (S-P) values. ResultsThe isotopic homogeneity of both USGS51 and USGS52 was demonstrated by one-sigma standard deviations associated with the determinations of their N-15, O-18, N-15, N-15 and S-P values of 0.12 mUr or better. The one-sigma standard deviations of S-P measurements of USGS51 and USGS52 reported by eight laboratories participating in the interlaboratory comparison were 1.27 and 1.78 mUr, respectively. ConclusionsThe agreement of isotope-delta values obtained in the interlaboratory comparison was not sufficient to provide reliable accurate isotope measurement values for USGS51 and USGS52. We propose that provisional values for the isotopic composition of USGS51 and USGS52 determined at the Tokyo Institute of Technology can be adopted for normalizing and reporting sample data until further refinements are achieved through additional calibration efforts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available