3.8 Proceedings Paper

Potentiometric urea biosensor utilizing nanobiocomposite of chitosan-iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles

Journal

21ST INTERNATIONAL LASER PHYSICS WORKSHOP
Volume 414, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/414/1/012024

Keywords

iron oxide (Fe3O4) magnetic nanoparticles; emission characteristics; potentiometric response; urea biosensor; chitosan solution

Funding

  1. International Science Programme (ISP)
  2. Uppsala University, Sweden
  3. Royal University of Phnom Penh (RUPP), Cambodia
  4. Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University [RGP-VPP-023]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The iron oxide (Fe3O4) magnetic nanoparticles have been fabricated through a simple, cheap and reproducible approach. Scanning electron microscope, x-rays powder diffraction of the fabricated nanoparticles. Furthermore, the fabrication of potentiometric urea biosensor is carried out through drop casting the initially prepared isopropanol and chitosan solution, containing Fe3O4 nanoparticles, on the glass fiber filter with a diameter of 2 cm and a copper wire (of thickness similar to 500 mu m) has been utilized to extract the voltage signal from the functionalized nanoparticles. The functionalization of surface of the Fe3O4 nanoparticles is obtained by the electrostatically immobilization of urease onto the nanobiocomposite of the chitosan-Fe3O4 in order to enhance the sensitivity, specificity, stability and reusability of urea biosensor. Electrochemical detection procedure has been adopted to measure the potentiometric response over the wide logarithmic concentration range of the 0.1 mM to 80 mM. The Fe3O4 nanoparticles based urea biosensor depicts good sensitivity with similar to 42 mV per decade at room temperature. Durability of the biosensor could be considerably enhanced by applying a thin layer of the nafion. In addition, the reasonably stable output response of the biosensor has been found to be around 12 sec.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available