4.7 Article

Intense atmospheric pollution modifies weather: a case of mixed biomass burning with fossil fuel combustion pollution in eastern China

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
Volume 13, Issue 20, Pages 10545-10554

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/acp-13-10545-2013

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. MOST 973 Program [2010CB428500, 2010CB950700]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [D0510/41275129]
  3. Jiangsu Provincial Program (Collaborative Innovation Center of Climate Change)
  4. Ministry of Education, China
  5. Academy of Finland [1118615, 139656]
  6. European Commission via ERC Advanced Grant ATM-NUCLE
  7. Academy of Finland (AKA) [139656] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The influence of air pollutants, especially aerosols, on regional and global climate has been widely investigated, but only a very limited number of studies report their impacts on everyday weather. In this work, we present for the first time direct (observational) evidence of a clear effect of how a mixed atmospheric pollution changes the weather with a substantial modification in the air temperature and rainfall. By using comprehensive measurements in Nanjing, China, we found that mixed agricultural burning plumes with fossil fuel combustion pollution resulted in a decrease in the solar radiation intensity by more than 70 %, a decrease in the sensible heat by more than 85 %, a temperature drop by almost 10 K, and a change in rainfall during both daytime and night-time. Our results show clear air pollution-weather interactions, and quantify how air pollution affects weather via air pollution-boundary layer dynamics and aerosol-radiation-cloud feedbacks. This study highlights cross-disciplinary needs to investigate the environmental, weather and climate impacts of the mixed biomass burning and fossil fuel combustion sources in East China.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available