4.5 Article

PROMISA (R)-29 v2.0 profile physical and mental health summary scores

Journal

QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages 1885-1891

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-018-1842-3

Keywords

Physical health; Mental health; Patient-reported; PROMIS (R); PROMIS (R)-29 profile

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute [1U2-CCA186878-01]
  2. National Institute on Aging [P30-AG021684]
  3. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [U2CCA186878] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [P30AG021684] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The PROMIS-29 v2.0 profile assesses pain intensity using a single 0-10 numeric rating item and seven health domains (physical function, fatigue, pain interference, depressive symptoms, anxiety, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and sleep disturbance) using four items per domain. This paper describes the development of physical and mental health summary scores for the PROMIS-29 v2.0. We conducted factor analyses of PROMIS-29 scales on data collected from two internet panels (n = 3000 and 2000). Confirmatory factor analyses provided support for a physical health factor defined by physical function, pain (interference and intensity), and ability to participate in social roles and activities, and a mental health factor defined primarily by emotional distress (anxiety and depressive symptoms). Reliabilities for these two summary scores were 0.98 (physical health) and 0.97 (mental health). Correlations of the PROMIS-29 v2.0 physical and mental health summary scores with chronic conditions and other health-related quality of life measures were consistent with a priori hypotheses. This study develops and provides preliminary evidence supporting the reliability and validity of PROMIS-29 v2.0 physical and mental health summary scores that can be used in future studies to assess impacts of health care interventions and track changes in health over time. Further evaluation of these and alternative summary measures is recommended.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available