4.3 Article

Consumer accounts of favourable dietary behaviour change and comparison with official dietary guidelines

Journal

PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages 1952-1960

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980018000241

Keywords

Dietary guidelines; Eating patterns; Dietary change; Qualitative research

Funding

  1. Espacio Interdisciplinario (Universidad de la Republica, Uruguay)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The current study aimed to assess Uruguayan consumers' accounts of their own need to change their dietary patterns, their intended changes and the barriers related to doing so, and to compare the intentions and barriers with the recommendations of the national dietary guidelines. Design: An online survey with 2381 Uruguayan employed adults, aged between 18 and 65 years, 65% females, was conducted. Participants had to answer two open-ended questions related to changes they could make in the foods they eat and/or the way in which they eat to improve the quality of their diet and the reasons why they had not implemented those changes yet. Content analysis using inductive coding by two researchers was used to analyse the responses. Results: Consumers mainly intended to change consumption of types of foods, particularly eating more fruits, vegetables and legumes and consuming less flour, but also intended to alter their eating patterns. Lack of time and the fact that healthy foods are perceived as being more expensive than unhealthy foods were major barriers to behaviour change. Some of the recommendations of the dietary guidelines, particularly those related to enjoying cooking and meals and engaging in it as a social activity, were not represented in consumer accounts. Conclusions: Accompanying policies to the dietary guidelines need to underline the importance of changes in dietary patterns, including greater enjoyment and sharing food preparation and meals in the company with others, address misconceptions about flour, and provide concrete, consumer-derived recommendations on how to enact the guidelines.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available