4.1 Article

Impact of a board-game approach on current smokers: a randomized controlled trial

Journal

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1747-597X-8-3

Keywords

Smoking; Smoking cessation; Cognitive behavior therapy; Motivational interviewing; Board games

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The main objective of our study was to assess the impact of a board game on smoking status and smoking-related variables in current smokers. To accomplish this objective, we conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing the game group with a psychoeducation group and a waiting-list control group. Methods: The following measures were performed at participant inclusion, as well as after a 2-week and a 3-month follow-up period: Attitudes Towards Smoking Scale (ATS-18), Smoking Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (SEQ-12), Attitudes Towards Nicotine Replacement Therapy scale (ANRT-12), number of cigarettes smoked per day, stages of change, quit attempts, and smoking status. Furthermore, participants were assessed for concurrent psychiatric disorders and for the severity of nicotine dependence with the Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND). Results: A time x group effect was observed for subscales of the ANRT-12, ATS-18 and SEQ-12, as well as for the number of cigarettes smoked per day. At three months follow-up, compared to the participants allocated to the waiting list group, those on Pick-Klop group were less likely to remain smoker. Outcomes at 3 months were not predicted by gender, age, FTND, stage of change, or psychiatric disorders at inclusion. Conclusions: The board game seems to be a good option for smokers. The game led to improvements in variables known to predict quitting in smokers. Furthermore, it increased smoking- cessation rates at 3-months follow-up. The game is also an interesting alternative for smokers in the precontemplation stage.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available