4.3 Review

Toward an integration of cognitive and genetic models of risk for depression

Journal

COGNITION & EMOTION
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages 193-216

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2012.712950

Keywords

Depression; Information processing; Psychiatric genetics; GxE

Funding

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [R01 HD057066, HD057066] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH076897, MH076897] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is growing interest in integrating cognitive and genetic models of depression risk. We review two ways in which these models can be meaningfully integrated. First, information-processing biases may represent intermediate phenotypes for specific genetic influences. These genetic influences may represent main effects on specific cognitive processes or may moderate the impact of environmental influences on information-processing biases. Second, cognitive and genetic influences may combine to increase reactivity to environmental stressors, increasing risk for depression in a genexcognitionxenvironment model of risk. There is now growing support for both of these ways of integrating cognitive and genetic models of depression risk. Specifically, there is support for genetic influences on information-processing biases, particularly the link between 5-HTTLPR and attentional biases, from both genetic association and genexenvironment (GxE) studies. There is also initial support for genexcognitionxenvironment models of risk in which specific genetic influences contribute to increased reactivity to environmental influences. We review this research and discuss important areas of future research, particularly the need for larger samples that allow for a broader examination of genetic and epigenetic influences as well as the combined influence of variability across a number of genes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available