4.5 Article

Elevated salivary alpha-amylase levels at awakening in patients with depression

Journal

PSYCHONEUROENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 97, Issue -, Pages 69-77

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.07.001

Keywords

Salivary alpha amylase; Salivary cortisol; Depression

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Specific Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) biomarkers could help improve our understanding of MDD pathophysiology and aid in the refinement of current MDD criteria. While salivary cortisol (SC) can differentiate between healthy controls and patients with psychiatric disorders, salivary alpha amylase (sAA), may be a putative candidate biomarker for MDD specifically. Methods: In a naturalistic cohort of consecutive out-patients and healthy controls, sAA and SC were determined in 833 participants (97 MDD patients, 142 patients with other mood, anxiety, and/or somatoform (MAS-) disorders, and 594 healthy controls). Samples were collected at 7 different time points (at awakening, after 30, 45, and 60 min, at 10:00 p.m., at 11:00 p.m., and at awakening on day 2). Results: The mean age of the sample was 43.8 years (SD = 12.9; 63.9% female). Concerning sAA, MDD patients had higher sAA levels upon awakening on two consecutive days (p = 0.04, p = 0.01 respectively), as well as a higher area under the curve with respect to the increase (AUCi; p = 0.04) in comparison to both controls and the other MAS-disorders group. Regarding SC, mean levels of evening SC were elevated in MDD patients (p = 0.049) in comparison to both controls and the other MAS-disorders group. SC values on day 2 after ingestion of dexamethasone were elevated in both MDD patients and the other MAS-disorders group (p = 0.04, p = 0.047 respectively). Conclusions: sAA at awakening and not cortisol differentiates MDD from other psychiatric disorders in outpatients. This suggests that sAA may be a valuable candidate biomarker specifically for MDD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available