4.7 Review

Sickness absence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological treatments for individuals on sick leave due to common mental disorders

Journal

PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE
Volume 48, Issue 12, Pages 1954-1965

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0033291718000065

Keywords

Meta-analysis; sick leave; absenteeism; return-to-work; review; CBT; PST; common mental disorders; anxiety; depression; insomnia; adjustment disorder

Funding

  1. Karolinska Institutet
  2. Stockholm County Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sick leave due to common mental disorders (CMDs) increase rapidly and present a major societal challenge. The overall effect of psychological interventions to reduce sick leave and symptoms has not been sufficiently investigated and there is a need for a systematic review and meta-analysis of the field. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to calculate the effect size of psychological interventions for CMDs on sick leave and psychiatric symptoms based on all published randomized controlled trials. Methodological quality, the risk of bias and publication bias were also assessed. The literature searches gave 2240 hits and 45 studies were included. The psychological interventions were more effective than care as usual on both reduced sick leave (g = 0.15) and symptoms (g = 0.21). There was no significant difference in effect between work focused interventions, problem-solving therapy, cognitive behavioural therapy or collaborative care. We conclude that psychological interventions are more effective than care as usual to reduce sick leave and symptoms but the effect sizes are small. More research is needed on psychological interventions that evaluate effects on sick leave. Consensual measures of sick leave should be established and quality of psychotherapy for patients on sick leave should be improved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available