4.6 Review

Linking Big Five Personality Traits to Sexuality and Sexual Health: A Meta-Analytic Review

Journal

PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN
Volume 144, Issue 10, Pages 1081-1110

Publisher

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/bul0000157

Keywords

erectile dysfunction; homophobia; reproductive health; sexual harassment; sexual assault

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This meta-analytic review addresses whether the major dimensions of trait personality relate to components of human sexuality. A comprehensive literature search identified 137 studies that met inclusion criteria (761 effect sizes; total n = 420,595). Pooled mean effects were computed using inverse-variance weighted random effects meta-analysis. Mean effect sizes from 100 separate meta-analyses provided evidence that personality relates to theoretically predicted components of sexuality and sexual health. Neuroticism was positively related to sexual dissatisfaction (r(+) = .18), negative emotions (r(+) = .42), and symptoms of sexual dysfunction (r(+) = .16). Extraversion was positively related to sexual activity (r(+) = .17) and risky sexual behavior (r(+) = .18), and negatively related to symptoms of sexual dysfunction (r(+) = -.17). Openness was positively related to homosexual orientation (r(+) = .16) and liberal attitudes toward sex (r(+) = .19). Agreeableness and conscientiousness were negatively related to sexually aggressive behavior (r(+) = -.20; r(+) = -.14) and sexual infidelity (r(+) = -.18; r(+) = -.17). Less robust evidence indicated that extraversion related negatively, and neuroticism positively, to child sexual abuse, and that openness related negatively to homophobic attitudes. Random effects metaregression identified age, gender, and study quality as important moderators of pooled mean effects. These findings might be of interest to health care professionals developing health care services that aim to promote sexually healthy societies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available