4.7 Article

An Efficient Approach for Automatic Rectangular Building Extraction From Very High Resolution Optical Satellite Imagery

Journal

IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages 487-491

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LGRS.2014.2347332

Keywords

Building extraction; geospatial object-based image analysis (GEOBIA); line segment detection; perceptual grouping; very high resolution (VHR).

Funding

  1. National High-Tech Research and Development Program of China [2012AA121305]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This letter presents a new approach for rapid automatic building extraction from very high resolution (VHR) optical satellite imagery. The proposed method conducts building extraction based on distinctive image primitives such as lines and line intersections. The optimized framework consists of three stages: First, a developed edge-preserving bilateral filter is adopted to reduce noise and enhance building edge contrast for preprocessing. Second, a state-of-the-art line segment detector called EDLines is introduced for the real-time accurate extraction of building line segments. Finally, we present a graph search-based perceptual grouping approach to hierarchically group previously detected line segments into candidate rectangular buildings. The recursive process was improved through the efficient examination of geometrical information with line linking and closed contour search, in order to obtain more reasonable omission and commission rate in building contour grouping. Extensive experiments performed on VHR optical QuickBird imageries justify the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed linear-time procedure with an overall accuracy of 80.9% and completeness of 87.3%. This method does not require user intervention and thereby has the potential to be adopted in online applications and industrial use in the near future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available