4.2 Review

Stress and Heart Rate Variability: A Meta-Analysis and Review of the Literature

Journal

PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages 235-245

Publisher

KOREAN NEUROPSYCHIATRIC ASSOC
DOI: 10.30773/pi.2017.08.17

Keywords

Heart rate variability; Stress; Autonomic nervous system

Categories

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant - Korean government (MSIP: Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning) [216C000671]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective Physical or mental imbalance caused by harmful stimuli can induce stress to maintain homeostasis. During chronic stress, the sympathetic nervous system is hyperactivated, causing physical, psychological, and behavioral abnormalities. At present, there is no accepted standard for stress evaluation. This review aimed to survey studies providing a rationale for selecting heart rate variability (HRV) as a psychological stress indicator. Methods Term searches in the Web of Science (R), National Library of Medicine (PubMed), and Google Scholar databases yielded 37 publications meeting our criteria. The inclusion criteria were involvement of human participants, HRV as an objective psychological stress measure, and measured HRV reactivity. Results In most studies, HRV variables changed in response to stress induced by various methods. The most frequently reported factor associated with variation in HRV variables was low parasympathetic activity, which is characterized by a decrease in the high-frequency band and an increase in the low-frequency band. Neuroimaging studies suggested that HRV may be linked to cortical regions (e.g., the ventromedial prefrontal cortex) that are involved in stressful situation appraisal. Conclusion In conclusion, the current neurobiological evidence suggests that HRV is impacted by stress and supports its use for the objective assessment of psychological health and stress.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available