4.4 Article

Heritable methylation marks associated with breast and prostate cancer risk

Journal

PROSTATE
Volume 78, Issue 13, Pages 962-969

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pros.23654

Keywords

aggressive prostate cancer; CLGN; DNA methylation; prostate cancer; VTRNA2-1

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council [1026892, 1061177, 209057, 396414]
  2. Cancer Council Victoria
  3. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1061177] Funding Source: NHMRC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundDNA methylation can mimic the effects of germline mutations in cancer predisposition genes. Recently, we identified twenty-four heritable methylation marks associated with breast cancer risk. As breast and prostate cancer share genetic risk factors, including rare, high-risk mutations (eg, in BRCA2), we hypothesized that some of these heritable methylation marks might also be associated with the risk of prostate cancer. MethodsWe studied 869 incident prostate cancers (430 aggressive and 439 non-aggressive) and 869 matched controls nested within a prospective cohort study. DNA methylation was measured in pre-diagnostic blood samples using the Illumina Infinium HM450K BeadChip. Conditional logistic regression models, adjusted for prostate cancer risk factors and blood cell composition, were used to estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the association between the 24 methylation marks and the risk of prostate cancer. ResultsFive methylation marks within the VTRNA2-1 promoter region (cg06536614, cg00124993, cg26328633, cg25340688, and cg26896946), and one in the body of CLGN (cg22901919) were associated with the risk of prostate cancer. In stratified analyses, the five VTRNA2-1 marks were associated with the risk of aggressive prostate cancer. ConclusionsThis work highlights a potentially important new area of investigation for prostate cancer susceptibility and adds to our knowledge about shared risk factors for breast and prostate cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available