4.4 Review

Meeting report from the Prostate Cancer Foundation PSMA-directed radionuclide scientific working group

Journal

PROSTATE
Volume 78, Issue 11, Pages 775-789

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pros.23642

Keywords

clinical trials; medical oncology; nuclear medicine; prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA); radiation therapy; radiology; radiopharmaceuticals; radionuclides; urology

Funding

  1. Progenics Pharmaceuticals
  2. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from Endocyte
  3. Progenics
  4. Bayer
  5. AAA
  6. ITG
  7. Endocyte

Ask authors/readers for more resources

IntroductionThe Prostate Cancer Foundation (PCF) convened a PSMA-Directed Radionuclide Scientific Working Group on November 14, 2017, at Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY. MethodsThe meeting was attended by 35 global investigators with expertise in prostate cancer biology, radionuclide therapy, molecular imaging, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted agents, drug development, and prostate cancer clinical trials. The goal of this meeting was to discuss the potential for using PSMA-targeted radionuclide agents for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer and to define the studies and clinical trials necessary for validating and optimizing the use of these agents. ResultsSeveral major topic areas were discussed including the overview of PSMA biology, lessons and applications of PSMA-targeted PET imaging, the nuances of designing PSMA-targeted radionuclide agents, clinical experiences with PSMA-targeted radionuclides, PCF-funded projects to accelerate PSMA-targeted radionuclide therapy, and barriers to the use of radionuclide treatments in widespread clinical practice. DiscussionThis article reviews the major topics discussed at the meeting with the goal of promoting research that will validate and optimize the use of PSMA-targeted radionuclide therapies for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available