3.8 Article

Suspended judgment

Journal

PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES
Volume 162, Issue 2, Pages 165-181

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11098-011-9753-y

Keywords

Epistemology; Doxastic attitudes; Suspended judgment; Withholding belief; Agnosticism; Indecision; Belief

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper I undertake an in-depth examination of an oft mentioned but rarely expounded upon state: suspended judgment. While traditional epistemology is sometimes characterized as presenting a yes or no picture of its central attitudes, in fact many of these epistemologists want to say that there is a third option: subjects can also suspend judgment. Discussions of suspension are mostly brief and have been less than clear on a number of issues, in particular whether this third option should be thought of as an attitude or not. In this paper I argue that suspended judgment is (or at least involves) a genuine attitude.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available