4.7 Article

Evaluation for the thermokinetics of the autocatalytic reaction of cumene hydroperoxide mixed with phenol through isothermal approaches and simulations

Journal

PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Volume 117, Issue -, Pages 426-438

Publisher

INST CHEMICAL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2018.05.025

Keywords

Inherently safer design; Thermal activity monitor III; Isothermal conditions; Cumene hydroperoxide; Autocatalytic reaction

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan [105-2221-E-224-001-MY3]
  2. Anhui University of Science and Technology in China [QN201613]
  3. Anhui Province Education Department, Natural Sciences Key Fund, China [KJ2017A078]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the petrochemical industry, estimation methods based on isothermal micro-calorimetry are used to precisely analyze the thermal hazards and risks associated with chemicals and to develop an inherently safer design (ISD). Here, a thermal activity monitor III (TAM III) was used under various isothermal conditions to obtain the thermokinetics parameters of reaction mechanisms. Cumene hydroperoxide (CHP), a typical organic peroxide, is decomposed by the action of sulfuric acid to yield phenol and acetone in equimolar quantities. CHP undergoes multiple complex reactions when an autocatalytic reaction occurs under isothermal decomposition. The following reaction scheme was considered in this study: A + nB reversible arrow (n + 1) B, A reversible arrow B, B -> C. This type of reaction generally accelerates as the reactant is consumed, and an autocatalytic substance is produced. As a result, an ISD is required for preparation, manufacturing, transportation, storage, and even elimination. The rich behavioral patterns of these autocatalytic reactions were revealed through multiple specific illustrations. (C) 2018 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available