4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Integrative process for a sugarcane bagasse biorefinery to produce glucose, bio-oil and carbon microspheres

Journal

PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Volume 116, Issue -, Pages 1-13

Publisher

INST CHEMICAL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2018.01.006

Keywords

Solid acid catalyst; Ionic liquid; Sugarcane bagasse; Hydrothermal; Pyrolysis; Bio-oil; Carbon microspheres

Funding

  1. Thailand Research Fund [RDG5950041, RTA598006]
  2. Energy Policy and Planning Office (EPPO), Ministry of Energy, Thailand

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Selective fractionation of cellulose from sugarcane bagasse (SCB) for the production of fermentable sugars was studied. The SCB was pretreated by hydrothermal pretreatment using five different types of solid acid catalysts (SACs): (1) self-synthesis SiO2-OSO3H, (2) SO42-/TiO2/Fe3O4/WO3, (3) sulfonated bentonite and commercial SAC, (4) Amberlyst 15, and (5) Dowex 50WX8. Fractionation of SCB was conducted in a combination with choline acetate (ChOAc) ionic liquid (IL) at moderate temperature. After enzyme hydrolysis, the highest total reducing sugar (TRS) yield of 78.1% was achieved when pretreated with SiO2-OSO3H. For the black liquor from fractionation, the highest amount of lignin could be precipitated from ChOAc IL through treatment with SO42-/TiO2/Fe3O4/WO3. Pyrolysis of dry precipitated lignin was performed at 400 and 500 degrees C under a nitrogen atmosphere, and phenolic-rich oil was produced. Carbon microspheres appeared in the solid phase from the pyrolysis. It was postulated that lignin was first degraded to phenol with an aromatic structure, while other sugar residues (C5 and C6) in the lignin molecule formed ring compounds. These compounds underwent condensation polymerization as a shell-like shape, and carbon rich microspheres were thus formed. (C) 2018 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available