4.6 Article

B vitamins and prebiotic fructooligosaccharides of cashew apple fermented with probiotic strains Lactobacillus spp., Leuconostoc mesenteroides and Bifidobacterium longum

Journal

PROCESS BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 70, Issue -, Pages 9-19

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2018.04.009

Keywords

Lactic acid bacteria; Fructooligosaccharides; Vitamin B; Fruit juice fermentation; Sugar compositions

Funding

  1. Royal Golden Jubilee Ph.D Program of Thailand [PHD/0186/2553]
  2. Heritage Grower Corporation Ltd., Thailand
  3. King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi, Thailand

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Five strains of probiotic; Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus plantarum, Leuconostoc mesenteroides, and Bifidobacteriwn longum were targeted for enhancing B-group vitamins and fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS) and raffinose family oligosaccharides (RFO) of cashew apple juice (CM) that is an underutilized byproduct from cashew nut processing. Although fermentation by Lb. acidophilus and Lb. casei resulted in increasing B-group vitamins contents (19.25% and 23.11%, respectively) than fermented CAJ with others pro biotic, vitamin B2 levels of fermented CAJ were not different significantly. Results also indicated total sugar contents of fructose, glucose, galactose, sucrose, melibiose, and maltotriose were decreased during 48 h of fermentation. The CM fermented with Lb. acidophilus and Lb. plantation had higher oligosaccharide contents (RFO and FOS). The CM fermented with Lb. acidophilus had the highest FOS of 1-kestose (GF(2)), nystose (GF(3)) and 1F-beta-fructofuranosyl nystose (GF(4)), whereas fermented with Lb. plantarum had the highest RFO (raffinose and stachyose). These results suggest that fermented CAJ could serve as a new prebiotic source with B-group vitamins for functional foods and nutraceutical applications for further human health application.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available