4.8 Article

Ocean acidification affects coral growth by reducing skeletal density

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1712806115

Keywords

coral calcification; ocean acidification; skeletal density; biomineralization

Funding

  1. US National Science Foundation Award [OCE-1220529]
  2. Robertson Foundation
  3. Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution through the Ocean Life Institute, Investment in Science Fund
  4. Leverhulme Trust in UK
  5. Taiwan MOST Grant [104-2628-M-001-007-MY3]
  6. Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution through the Ocean Life Institute, Early Career Award
  7. NERC [NE/H017356/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ocean acidification (OA) is considered an important threat to coral reef ecosystems, because it reduces the availability of carbonate ions that reef-building corals need to produce their skeletons. However, while theory predicts that coral calcification rates decline as carbonate ion concentrations decrease, this prediction is not consistently borne out in laboratory manipulation experiments or in studies of corals inhabiting naturally low-pH reefs today. The skeletal growth of corals consists of two distinct processes: extension (upward growth) and densification (lateral thickening). Here, we show that skeletal density is directly sensitive to changes in seawater carbonate ion concentration and thus, to OA, whereas extension is not. We present a numerical model of Porites skeletal growth that links skeletal density with the external seawater environment via its influence on the chemistry of coral calcifying fluid. We validate the model using existing coral skeletal datasets from six Porites species collected across five reef sites and use this framework to project the impact of 21st century OA on Porites skeletal density across the global tropics. Our model predicts that OA alone will drive up to 20.3 +/- 5.4% decline in the skeletal density of reef-building Porites corals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available