4.8 Article

The biomass distribution on Earth

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1711842115

Keywords

ecology; biomass; biosphere; quantitative biology

Funding

  1. European Research Council [NOVCARBFIX 646827]
  2. Israel Science Foundation [740/16]
  3. ISF-NRF Singapore Joint Research Program [7662712]
  4. Beck Canadian Center for Alternative Energy Research
  5. Ullmann Family Foundation
  6. Helmsley Charitable Foundation
  7. Larson Charitable Foundation
  8. Wolfson Family Charitable Trust
  9. Selmo Nussenbaum
  10. NIH [1R35 GM118043-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A census of the biomass on Earth is key for understanding the structure and dynamics of the biosphere. However, a global, quantitative view of how the biomass of different taxa compare with one another is still lacking. Here, we assemble the overall biomass composition of the biosphere, establishing a census of the approximate to 550 gigatons of carbon (Gt C) of biomass distributed among all of the kingdoms of life. We find that the kingdoms of life concentrate at different locations on the planet; plants (approximate to 450 Gt C, the dominant kingdom) are primarily terrestrial, whereas animals (approximate to 2 Gt C) are mainly marine, and bacteria (approximate to 70 Gt C) and archaea (approximate to 7 Gt C) are predominantly located in deep subsurface environments. We show that terrestrial biomass is about two orders of magnitude higher than marine biomass and estimate a total of approximate to 6 Gt C of marine biota, doubling the previous estimated quantity. Our analysis reveals that the global marine biomass pyramid contains more consumers than producers, thus increasing the scope of previous observations on inverse food pyramids. Finally, we highlight that the mass of humans is an order of magnitude higher than that of all wild mammals combined and report the historical impact of humanity on the global biomass of prominent taxa, including mammals, fish, and plants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available