4.8 Article

Iterative near-term ecological forecasting: Needs, opportunities, and challenges

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1710231115

Keywords

forecast; ecology; prediction

Funding

  1. NSF [1638577, 1638575, 1137327, 1347883, 1241856, 1614392]
  2. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation's Data Driven Discovery Initiative [GBMF4563, GBMF4555]
  3. NSF Postdoctoral Research Fellowship in Biology [DBI-1400370]
  4. National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON)
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences [1457890, 1458021, 1457897] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Division Of Environmental Biology [1137327] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two foundational questions about sustainability are How are ecosystems and the services they provide going to change in the future? and How do human decisions affect these trajectories? Answering these questions requires an ability to forecast ecological processes. Unfortunately, most ecological forecasts focus on centennial-scale climate responses, therefore neither meeting the needs of near-term (daily to decadal) environmental decision-making nor allowing comparison of specific, quantitative predictions to new observational data, one of the strongest tests of scientific theory. Near-term forecasts provide the opportunity to iteratively cycle between performing analyses and updating predictions in light of new evidence. This iterative process of gaining feedback, building experience, and correcting models and methods is critical for improving forecasts. Iterative, near-term forecasting will accelerate ecological research, make it more relevant to society, and inform sustainable decision-making under high uncertainty and adaptive management. Here, we identify the immediate scientific and societal needs, opportunities, and challenges for iterative near-term ecological forecasting. Over the past decade, data volume, variety, and accessibility have greatly increased, but challenges remain in interoperability, latency, and uncertainty quantification. Similarly, ecologists have made considerable advances in applying computational, informatic, and statistical methods, but opportunities exist for improving forecast-specific theory, methods, and cyberinfrastructure. Effective forecasting will also require changes in scientific training, culture, and institutions. The need to start forecasting is now; the time for making ecology more predictive is here, and learning by doing is the fastest route to drive the science forward.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available