Journal
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS
Volume 112, Issue 2, Pages 301-312Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-012-1251-4
Keywords
Adam Smith; Beneficence; Corporate social responsibility; Justice; Perfect rights; Stakeholders
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This article leverages insights from the body of Adam Smith's work, including two lesser-known manuscripts-the Theory of Moral Sentiments and Lectures in Jurisprudence-to help answer the question as to how companies should morally prioritize corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives and stakeholder claims. Smith makes philosophical distinctions between justice and beneficence and perfect and imperfect rights, and we leverage those distinctions to speak to contemporary CSR and stakeholder management theories. We address the often-neglected question as to how far a company should be expected to go in pursuit of CSR initiatives and we offer a fresh perspective as to the role of business in relation to stakeholders and to society as a whole. Smith's moral insights help us to propose a practical framework of legitimacy in stakeholder claims that can help managers select appropriate and responsible CSR activities.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available