Journal
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages 82-93Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/jss099
Keywords
adolescents; children; chronic and recurrent pain; developmental perspectives; qualitative methods
Categories
Funding
- NIAMS NIH HHS [2U01AR052181, 1U01AR057936, K24 AR056687, 1U01AR057954, 1U01AR057929, 1U01AR057940, 1U01AR052171, 1U01AR057956, U01AR057971, 1U01AR057967, 1U01AR057948, 2U01AR052186, U01 AR057940, 1U54AR057926, 2U01AR052158, 1U54AR057943, 2U01AR052155, 1U54AR057951] Funding Source: Medline
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Objectives To examine the content validity of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System pediatric measures, including the pain interference scale, among children and adolescents (aged 8-18 years) who experience chronic pain. To describe children's understandings of the health domain constructs and elucidate verbal and conceptual aspects of self-reported pain-related functioning, which shape disclosure and reporting. Methods 34 children and youth with diagnoses of juvenile idiopathic arthritis or noninflammatory chronic pain completed semistructured and cognitive interviews exploring the meaning, experience, and expression of up to 4 of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System pediatric domains: anger, anxiety, depressive symptoms, fatigue, pain interference, and peer relationships. Team-based thematic and content analyses were conducted. Results Clear verbal and social-cognitive differences were observed in representations and accounts of the domain-experiences across age-groups, but we noted little, if any, evidence of problems with content validity. Conclusions Findings suggest the importance of a rigorous developmental approach for understanding the verbal and cognitive dimensions of pediatric self-reports and patient-reported outcomes.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available