4.8 Article

Quantifying flow and stress in ice melange, the world's largest granular material

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1715136115

Keywords

jamming; granular; glacier; melange; calving

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DMR-1506446, DMR-1506991, DMR-1506307]
  2. NASA Earth and Space Fellowship [NNX14AL29H]
  3. Division Of Materials Research
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1506307] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tidewater glacier fjords are often filled with a collection of calved icebergs, brash ice, and sea ice. For glaciers with high calving rates, this melange of ice can be jam-packed, so that the flow of ice fragments is mostly determined by granular interactions. In the jammed state, ice melange has been hypothesized to influence iceberg calving and capsize, dispersion and attenuation of ocean waves, injection of freshwater into fjords, and fjord circulation. However, detailed measurements of ice melange are lacking due to difficulties in instrumenting remote, ice-choked fjords. Here we characterize the flow and associated stress in ice melange, using a combination of terrestrial radar data, laboratory experiments, and numerical simulations. We find that, during periods of terminus quiescence, ice melange experiences laminar flow over timescales of hours to days. The uniform flow fields are bounded by shear margins along fjord walls where force chains between granular icebergs terminate. In addition, the average force per unit width that is transmitted to the glacier terminus, which can exceed 10(7) N/m, increases exponentially with the melange length-to-width ratio. These buttressing forces are sufficiently high to inhibit the initiation of large-scale calving events, supporting the notion that ice melange can be viewed as a weak granular ice shelf that transmits stresses from fjord walls back to glacier termini.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available