4.8 Article

Adaptation of commensal proliferating Escherichia coli to the intestinal tract of young children with cystic fibrosis

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1714373115

Keywords

gastrointestinal microbiome; Escherichia coli; cystic fibrosis

Funding

  1. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases at the National Institutes of Health [DK089507, 1R01DK095869-01A1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mature human gut microbiota is established during the first years of life, and altered intestinal microbiomes have been associated with several human health disorders. Escherichia coli usually represents less than 1% of the human intestinal microbiome, whereas in cystic fibrosis (CF), greater than 50% relative abundance is common and correlates with intestinal inflammation and fecal fat malabsorption. Despite the proliferation of E. coli and other Proteobacteria in conditions involving chronic gastrointestinal tract inflammation, little is known about adaptation of specific characteristics associated with microbiota clonal expansion. We show that E. coli isolated from fecal samples of young children with CF has adapted to growth on glycerol, a major component of fecal fat. E. coli isolates from different CF patients demonstrate an increased growth rate in the presence of glycerol compared with E. coli from healthy controls, and unrelated CF E. coli strains have independently acquired this growth trait. Furthermore, CF and control E. coli isolates have differential gene expression when grown in minimal media with glycerol as the sole carbon source. While CF isolates display a growth-promoting transcriptional profile, control isolates engage stress and stationary-phase programs, which likely results in slower growth rates. Our results indicate that there is selection of unique characteristics within the microbiome of individuals with CF, which could contribute to individual disease outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available