4.8 Article

Preordering of water is not needed for ice recognition by hyperactive antifreeze proteins

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1806996115

Keywords

antifreeze protein; molecular recognition; interfacial water; vibrational spectroscopy; ice

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CHE-1305427]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Antifreeze proteins (AFPs) inhibit ice growth in organisms living in cold environments. Hyperactive insect AFPs are particularly effective, binding ice through anchored clathrate motifs. It has been hypothesized that the binding of hyperactive AFPs to ice is facilitated by preordering of water at the ice-binding site (IBS) of the protein in solution. The antifreeze protein TmAFP displays the best matching of its binding site to ice, making it the optimal candidate to develop ice-like order in solution. Here we use multiresolution simulations to unravel the mechanism by which TmAFP recognizes and binds ice. We find that water at the IBS of the antifreeze protein in solution does not acquire ice-like or anchored clathratelike order. Ice recognition occurs by slow diffusion of the protein to achieve the proper orientation with respect to the ice surface, followed by fast collective organization of the hydration water at the IBS to form an anchored clathrate motif that latches the protein to the ice surface. The simulations suggest that anchored clathrate order could develop on the large ice-binding surfaces of aggregates of ice-nucleating proteins (INP). We compute the infrared and Raman spectra of water in the anchored clathrate motif. The signatures of the OH stretch of water in the anchored clathrate motif can be distinguished from those of bulk liquid in the Raman spectra, but not in the infrared spectra. We thus suggest that Raman spectroscopy may be used to probe the anchored clathrate order at the icebinding surface of INP aggregates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available