4.8 Article

A comprehensive omics analysis and functional survey of cuticular proteins in the brown planthopper

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1716951115

Keywords

insect cuticular proteins; transcriptomic analysis; proteomic analysis; large-scale RNAi; brown planthopper

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31630057, 31471765]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cuticle, mainly composed of chitin and cuticular proteins (CPs), is a multifunctional structure of arthropods. CPs usually account for >1% of the total insect proteins. Why does an insect encode so many different CP genes in the genome? In this study, we use comprehensive large-scale technologies to study the full complement of CPs (i.e., the CP-ome) of the brown planthopper (BPH), Nilaparvata lugens, a major rice plant pest. Eight CP families (CPR, CPF, TWDL, CPLCP, CPG, CPAP1, CPAP3, and CPAPn) including 140 proteins in BPH, in which CPAPn is a CP family that we discovered. The CPG family that was considered to be restricted to the Lepidoptera has also been identified in BPH. As reported here, CPLCP family members are characterized by three conserved sequence motifs. In addition, we identified a testis protein family with a peritrophin A domain that we named TPAP. We authenticated the real existence of 106 proteins among the 140 CPs. RNA interference (RNAi) experiments were conducted against 135 CP genes in early- and late-instar nymphs and newly emerged female adults, demonstrating that 32 CPs were essential for BPH normal development or egg production. Combined RNAi experiments suggested redundant and complementary functions of the large number of CPs. Transcriptomic data revealed that the CP genes were expressed in a tissue-specific manner, and there were four clusters of developmental expression patterns. This study gives a comprehensive understanding of the roles of CPs in an insect cuticle.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available