4.6 Article

Evaluation of reaction progress variable - mixture fraction statistics in partially premixed flames

Journal

PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages 2241-2248

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2018.06.129

Keywords

Inhomogeneous jet; Partially premixed flames; Transported PDF; Progress variable; Mixture fraction

Funding

  1. President's PhD Scholarship scheme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mixture fraction and reaction progress variables are key for presumed probability density function (PDF) based flamelet models for partially premixed flames. The importance of the joint statistics of these two variables are evaluated using a joint composition-enthalpy transported PDF/Finite Volume method applied to established databases for inhomogeneous jet flames. The accuracy of the approach is first examined for three flames with different mixture fraction inlet profiles and departures from blow-off. The (joint-) statistics of mixture fraction and reaction progress variable are subsequently analysed with the covariance of the two variables used to evaluate the assumption of statistical independence. Results show that the current approach is able to reproduce the near-field features of both homogeneous and inhomogeneous jet flames. The latter leads to a stratified premixed flame that evolves to diffusion-dominated combustion as the influence of the pilot fades. In agreement with measured data, the mixture fraction variance is strongly affected by the near-field combustion mode and the misalignment with the reaction progress variable variance is obvious in the stratified premixed flame. It is shown that the covariance of the mixture fraction and reaction progress variable is influenced by turbulence-chemistry interactions and that, generally, the two parameters remain strongly correlated with the consequence that the assumption of statistical independence is implausible. (C) 2018 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available