4.6 Article

Dynamic evolution of impaction and sticking behaviors of fly ash particle in pulverized coal combustion

Journal

PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE
Volume 37, Issue 4, Pages 4419-4426

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2018.06.035

Keywords

Coal combustion; Ash deposition; Impact velocity and angle; Impaction efficiency; Sticking probability

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51725601]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFB0600602]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper aims to reveal the mechanisms governing the impaction and sticking dynamics of fly ash particles in pulverized coal combustion. The modeling work is of relevance to experiments in a 25 kW self-sustained down-fired furnace, which provides a sequence of real deposit shapes as varied boundary conditions for CFD simulations. Although the formed ash deposit has a comparable length scale with the probe, it has little effect on the global impaction efficiency of newly-coming particles. However, as the deposit builds up, incident particles impact the deposit and probe at generally larger impact angles and smaller normal velocities despite the almost invariant global impaction efficiency. It results in an enhanced local sticking probability in the center region of the probe, but a decreased one in the lateral regions. The incident kinetic energy of newly sticking particles to the deposit exhibits a converse correlation with their impact angle. The relationship of the averaged local sticking probability as a function of the azimuthal angle of probe is illustrated. Finally, the effect of Reynolds number on global particle impaction efficiency is examined. A universal formula is proposed, which is of importance to bridge lab-scale experiments and practical applications. (C) 2018 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available