4.7 Article

Combined sludge conditioning with NaCl-cationic polyacrylamide-rice husk powders to improve sludge dewaterability

Journal

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
Volume 336, Issue -, Pages 191-198

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2018.05.042

Keywords

Excess sludge; NaCl; Cationic polyacrylamide; Flocculation; Filter aid

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [511780479, 51578068]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Strong water binding ability of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) and high compressibility of sludge during compression dewatering have greatly hindered the improvement of sludge dewaterability. In this paper, a novel combined conditioning method was proposed to enhance the sludge dewaterability. The sludge was firstly disintegrated by NaCl, then the sludge particles were re-flocculated by cationic polyacrylamide (CPAM), meanwhile the sludge filter cake was modified with rice husk (RH) as filter aid. The results showed that combined NaCl-CPAM-RH conditioning greatly improved the sludge dewaterability compared with that of raw sludge. The optimal NaCI pretreatment lasted 120 min with a dosage of 0.25 mol/L, the optimal CPAM and RH dosage was 30 mg/L and 50 wt%, respectively, which led to a moisture content of sludge cake of 65.44%. The changes of sludge liquid and solid phase conditioned by NaCl-CPAM-RH were analyzed. The NaCI pretreatment disintegrated the sludge floc structure with the release of protein and polysaccharide from EPS and Ca2+ and Mg2+ from sludge flocs to liquid, accompanying with the release of water trapped in sludge matrix. The addition of CPAM and RH reconstructed the sludge flocs with a big mean diameter d(0.5) of 126.84 mu m, and the sludge filter cake showed a porous and rigid structure with a porosity increment of 138.62% and a compressibility reduction of 39.62% compared to that of raw sludge. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available