4.7 Review

Evaluation of correlations for minimum fluidization velocity (Umf) in gas-solid fluidization

Journal

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
Volume 323, Issue -, Pages 454-485

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2017.10.016

Keywords

Minimum fluidization velocity (U-mf); Gas-solid fluidization; Empirical correlations; Geldart Group

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation (NRF), Prime Minister's Office, Singapore under Campus for Research Excellence and Technological Enterprise (CREATE)
  2. Joint Singapore-Germany Research Project Fund [SGP-PROG3-019]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The minimum fluidization velocity (U-mf), defined as the superficial gas velocity at which the drag force of the upward moving gas becomes equal to the weight of the particles in the bed, is one of the most important parameters associated with a fluidized bed system. Specifically, it is the point at which all the particles become suspended. Unsurprisingly, more than a hundred correlations have sprouted since 1950 to enable the prediction of the U-mf value. However, discrepancies among the predictions are significant, which limits the utility of each correlation. Accordingly, this study attempts to provide a comprehensive comparison of the U-mf values predicted by the correlations available, which are classified into four types depending on the form of the equation and applied to more popular Geldart Groups A, B and D particles. The following observations are highlighted: (i) discrepancies among U-mf predictions are presumably attributed to the empirical data-fitting based on limited experimental datasets rather than physical understanding; (ii) correlations involving an empirical coefficient as an exponent exhibit greater discrepancies (up to 6 orders-of-magnitude) in U-mf predictions than those without; (iii) predictions for Geldart Group A particles displayed greater discrepancies across categories, due to a lack of understanding of cohesive forces associated with Group A particles; (iv) correlations involving voidage (epsilon(mf)) and sphericity (phi) exhibit more unphysical trends than those without, presumably due to a limited range of epsilon(mf) and phi experimentally assessed, hence the inclusion of these two parameters increased the errors associated with these correlations. A mechanistically based correlation may be still intractable at this point, so recommendations are made for future studies on improving the prediction of U-mf. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available