4.7 Article

Design Guidelines for Spatial Modulation

Journal

IEEE COMMUNICATIONS SURVEYS AND TUTORIALS
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages 6-26

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/COMST.2014.2327066

Keywords

Cooperative communications; large-scale MIMO; link adaptation; space-time coding; spatial modulation

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [61101101]
  2. European Research Council's Advanced Fellow Grant
  3. National Basic Research Program of China [2013CB329001]
  4. European Commission under the FP7-PEOPLE ITN-GREENET Project [264759]
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/J016640/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. EPSRC [EP/J016640/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new class of low-complexity, yet energy-efficient Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (MIMO) transmission techniques, namely, the family of Spatial Modulation (SM) aided MIMOs (SM-MIMO), has emerged. These systems are capable of exploiting the spatial dimensions (i.e., the antenna indices) as an additional dimension invoked for transmitting information, apart from the traditional Amplitude and Phase Modulation (APM). SM is capable of efficiently operating in diverse MIMO configurations in the context of future communication systems. It constitutes a promising transmission candidate for large-scale MIMO design and for the indoor optical wireless communication while relying on a single-Radio Frequency (RF) chain. Moreover, SM may be also viewed as an entirely new hybrid modulation scheme, which is still in its infancy. This paper aims for providing a general survey of the SM design framework as well as of its intrinsic limits. In particular, we focus our attention on the associated transceiver design, on spatial constellation optimization, on link adaptation techniques, on distributed/cooperative protocol design issues, and on their meritorious variants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available