4.6 Article

QLT091001, a 9-cis-Retinal Analog, Is Well-Tolerated by Retinas of Mice with Impaired Visual Cycles

Journal

INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE
Volume 54, Issue 1, Pages 455-466

Publisher

ASSOC RESEARCH VISION OPHTHALMOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.12-11152

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. QLT Inc, Vancouver, Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSE. Investigate whether retinas of mice with impaired retinal cycles exposed to light or kept in the dark tolerate prolonged high-dose administration of QLT091001, which contains as an active ingredient, the 9-cis-retinal precursor, 9-cis-retinyl acetate. METHODS. Four-to six-week-old Lrat(-/-) and Rpe65(-/-) mice (n = 126) as well as crossbred Gnat1(-/-) mice lacking rod photo-transduction (n = 110) were gavaged weekly for 6 months with 50 mg/kg QLT091001, either after being kept in the dark or after light bleaching for 30 min/wk followed by maintenance in a 12-hour light <= 10 lux)/12-hour dark cycle. Retinal health was monitored by spectral-domain optical coherent tomography (SD-OCT) and scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (SLO) every other month and histological, biochemical, and visual functional analyses were performed at the end of the experiment. Two-photon microscopy (TPM) was used to observe retinoid-containing retinosome structures in the RPE. RESULTS. Retinal thickness and morphology examined by SD-OCT were well maintained in all strains treated with QLT091001. No significant increases of fundus autofluorescence were detected by SLO imaging of any strain. Accumulation of all-trans-retinyl esters varied with genetic background, types of administered compounds and lighting conditions but retinal health was not compromised. TPM imaging clearly revealed maintenance of retinosomes in the RPE of all mouse strains tested. CONCLUSIONS. Retinas of Lrat(-/-), Rpe65(-/-), and crossbred Gnat1(-/-) mice tolerated prolonged high-dose QLT091001 treatment well. (Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013; 54: 455-466) DOI: 10.1167/iovs.12-11152

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available