4.1 Article

Why can't a woman bid more like a man?

Journal

GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR
Volume 77, Issue 1, Pages 181-213

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.geb.2012.10.002

Keywords

Gender; Menstrual cycle; Contraceptive pills; Auction; Experiment

Categories

Funding

  1. Divn Of Social and Economic Sciences
  2. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [0962492] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigate gender differences and menstrual cycle effects in first-price and second-price sealed-bid auctions with independent private values in a laboratory setting. We find that women bid significantly higher and earn significantly less than men do in the first-price auction, while we find no evidence of a gender difference in bidding or earnings in the second-price auction. Focusing on the first-price auction, we find that, while the gender gap in bidding and earnings persists over the entire course of the menstrual cycle, bidding of contraceptive pill users follows a sine-like pattern throughout the menstrual cycle, with higher than average bidding in the follicular phase and lower than average bidding in the luteal phase. In comparison, pill non-users have a flat bidding profile throughout the cycle. (c) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available