4.3 Article

Estimating Crop Water Requirements and Assessing Irrigation Water Distribution Cost for Rice Production Using a Pipe Network

Journal

POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages 1071-1083

Publisher

HARD
DOI: 10.15244/pjoes/76313

Keywords

irrigation; water distribution network; rice; cost; crop water requirement

Funding

  1. Minor Research Project, TEQIP II, ISM Dhanbad

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper we attempted to estimate crop water requirement for rice production in an Indian state. We also assessed the cost of irrigation water distribution. The study area (phases I and II) belongs to a humid subtropical region with sandy clay loam soil. Here, farmers are presently using a partial border strip irrigation technique with supply pipe and riser. First, the Man Kendall test is performed on six years monthly rainfall data to check for the presence of a trend. We found that the data is random at a 5% significant level. Thereafter, the crop water requirement for rice production is calculated based on FAO guidelines and average monthly rainfall. The crop water requirement in the study area amounted to 7.22 lakh m(3), of which Phase I is 6.12 lakh m(3) and Phase II is 1.2 lakh m(3). In order to fulfil this requirement, irrigation was conducted through a pipe network. Actual irrigation value is calculated based on four years of irrigation water distribution data. Finally, the average depth of water logging, time of pumping, and cost for surplus irrigated water are calculated. We found that at a rate of INR 5 per unit kWh, the cost of annual surplus irrigated water for rice is 4.32 lakhs for an irrigation area of 1.284 km(2) (phase I), and the same is INR 0.84 lakh for 0.252 km(2) (phase II). This loss can be minimized using proper scheduled regulation of irrigated water using the pipe distribution network.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available