4.3 Article

Gonadal histology and gametogenesis of the Antarctic limpet Nacella concinna (Patellogastropoda, Nacellidae) collected at Potter Cove, 25 de Mayo (King George) Island, during austral summer

Journal

POLAR BIOLOGY
Volume 41, Issue 9, Pages 1751-1762

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00300-018-2314-5

Keywords

Nacella concinna; Gametogenesis; Internal fertilization; Meiosis

Funding

  1. FONCyT/DNA-IAA [PICTO 0091]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The limpet Nacella concinna is one of the most widely distributed gastropods along the Antarctic Peninsula. This species has been a useful tool in ecological and physiological studies for understanding Antarctic trophic interactions. Although the reproduction of limpets has been thoroughly studied, very little is known about gametogenesis in the genus Nacella. The purpose of this study is to describe the gonadal morphology and gametogenesis in N. concinna observed by light microscopy and to determine its chromosome complement. All the limpets were sexually mature at the time of sampling. Oocytes were separated by trabeculae with abundant glycogen reserves. There was a predominance of late vitellogenic oocytes. Many previtellogenic oocytes were pyriform in shape. Oogonia were clustered near the ovary wall or the trabeculae. Only two meiotic stages were found: metaphase I and anaphase I, both of which showed a regular arrangement of chromosomes. The oviduct contained mature oocytes surrounded by sperm. Testicular tubules were filled with spermatozoa. The elongated head of the spermatozoon resembles that of other Nacellidae members. One of the bivalents is heteropycnotic. The haploid complement is n=4 and the sex determination system is XO/XX. Although N. concinna has been commonly characterized as a broadcast-spawner, its unique spawning behavior, the presence of oocytes at anaphase I and spermatozoa within the oviduct suggests internal fertilization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available