Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Multivariate and network meta-analysis of multiple outcomes and multiple treatments: rationale, concepts, and examples
Richard D. Riley et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2017)
Multivariate and network meta-analysis of multiple outcomes and multiple treatments: rationale, concepts, and examples
Richard D. Riley et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2017)
Network meta-analysis: a technique to gather evidence from direct and indirect comparisons
Fernanda S. Tonin et al.
PHARMACY PRACTICE-GRANADA (2017)
Rejoinder to the discussion of a Bayesian missing data framework for generalized multiple outcome mixed treatment comparisons, by S. Dias and AE Ades
Hwanhee Hong et al.
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS (2016)
Absolute or relative effects? Arm-based synthesis of trial data
S. Dias et al.
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS (2016)
Network meta-analyses should be the highest level of evidence in treatment guidelines
Stefan Leucht et al.
EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE (2016)
Randomized Clinical Trials and Observational Studies: Is There a Battle?
Mariana Chavez-MacGregor et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY (2016)
On the need for increased rigour and care in the conduct and interpretation of network meta-analyses in drug development
Kevin Carroll et al.
PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS (2016)
Journal impact factor - Handle with care
Tanuj Kanchan et al.
BIOMEDICAL JOURNAL (2016)
International Collaboration Patterns and Effecting Factors of Emerging Technologies
Xu Bai et al.
PLOS ONE (2016)
The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations
Brian Hutton et al.
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (2015)
Use and mis-use of supplementary material in science publications
Mihai Pop et al.
BMC BIOINFORMATICS (2015)
A multilevel approach to network meta-analysis within a frequentist framework
Teresa Greco et al.
CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS (2015)
An Observational Study Goes Where Randomized Clinical Trials Have Not
Austin B. Frakt
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2015)
Methods to select results to include in meta-analyses deserve more consideration in systematic reviews
Matthew J. Page et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2015)
What is the future of biomedical research?
Giovanni Domenico Tebala
MEDICAL HYPOTHESES (2015)
Detecting outlying trials in network meta-analysis
Jing Zhang et al.
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2015)
Extending Treatment Networks in Health Technology Assessment: How Far Should We Go?
Deborah M. Caldwell et al.
VALUE IN HEALTH (2015)
Improving the evidence base for better comparative effectiveness research
James M. Brophy
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH (2015)
The Continuing Growth of Global Cooperation Networks in Research: A Conundrum for National Governments
Caroline S. Wagner et al.
PLOS ONE (2015)
Capacity for conducting systematic reviews in low- and middle-income countries: a rapid appraisal
Sandy Oliver et al.
HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS (2015)
Constructing a Search Strategy and Searching for Evidence
Edoardo Aromataris et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING (2014)
Global collaborative networks on meta-analyses of randomized trials published in high impact factor medical journals: a social network analysis
Ferran Catala-Lopez et al.
BMC MEDICINE (2014)
Overview of methods for comparing the efficacies of drugs in the absence of head-to-head clinical trial data
Hansoo Kim et al.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY (2014)
Network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials: Reporting the proper summaries
Jing Zhang et al.
CLINICAL TRIALS (2014)
Do Current Clinical Trials Meet Society's Needs? A Critical Review of Recent Evidence
Stuart J. Pocock et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY (2014)
The Quality of Reporting Methods and Results in Network Meta-Analyses: An Overview of Reviews and Suggestions for Improvement
Brian Hutton et al.
PLOS ONE (2014)
Evaluating the Quality of Evidence from a Network Meta-Analysis
Georgia Salanti et al.
PLOS ONE (2014)
Network meta-analysis for comparing treatment effects of multiple interventions: an introduction
Ferran Catala-Lopez et al.
RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL (2014)
Hierarchical network meta-analysis models to address sparsity of events and differing treatment classifications with regard to adverse outcomes
Fiona C. Warren et al.
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2014)
A Comparison of National Guidelines for Network Meta-Analysis
Andrew Laws et al.
VALUE IN HEALTH (2014)
Indirect Treatment Comparison/Network Meta-Analysis Study Questionnaire to Assess Relevance and Credibility to Inform Health Care Decision Making: An ISPOR-AMCP-NPC Good Practice Task Force Report
Jeroen P. Jansen et al.
VALUE IN HEALTH (2014)
Reporting of results from network meta-analyses: methodological systematic review
Aida Bafeta et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2014)
Is network meta-analysis as valid as standard pairwise meta-analysis? It all depends on the distribution of effect modifiers
Jeroen P. Jansen et al.
BMC MEDICINE (2013)
Decline In Placebo-Controlled Trial Results Suggests New Directions For Comparative Effectiveness Research
Mark Olfson et al.
HEALTH AFFAIRS (2013)
Evaluation of inconsistency in networks of interventions
Areti Angeliki Veroniki et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2013)
Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 2: A Generalized Linear Modeling Framework for Pairwise and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Sofia Dias et al.
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING (2013)
Graphical Tools for Network Meta-Analysis in STATA
Anna Chaimani et al.
PLOS ONE (2013)
Analysis of the systematic reviews process in reports of network meta-analyses: methodological systematic review
Aida Bafeta et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2013)
Unsolved issues of mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis: network size and inconsistency
Sibylle Sturtz et al.
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS (2012)
Indirect and mixed-treatment comparison, network, or multiple-treatments meta-analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool
Georgia Salanti
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS (2012)
Sample size and power considerations in network meta-analysis
Kristian Thorlund et al.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2012)
Network meta-analysis-highly attractive but more methodological research is needed
Tianjing Li et al.
BMC MEDICINE (2011)
Conducting Indirect-Treatment-Comparison and Network-Meta-Analysis Studies: Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: Part 2
David C. Hoaglin et al.
VALUE IN HEALTH (2011)
Fifteen common mistakes encountered in clinical research
Glenn T. Clark et al.
JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTIC RESEARCH (2011)
Registering systematic reviews
Sharon Straus et al.
CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL (2010)
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
David Moher et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2009)
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration
Alessandro Liberati et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2009)
Evaluation of networks of randomized trials
Georgia Salanti et al.
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH (2008)
Calculating impact factor: How bibliographical classification of journal items affects the impact factor of large and small journals
Rajna Golubic et al.
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS (2008)
Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews
David Moher et al.
PLOS MEDICINE (2007)
Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons
G Lu et al.
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2004)
Network meta-analysis for indirect treatment comparisons
T Lumley
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2002)
Active-control trials: How would a new agent compare with placebo? A method illustrated clopidogrel, aspirin, and placebo
LD Fisher et al.
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL (2001)
Share Paper
