4.1 Article

Evaluation of a Fotonovela to Increase Depression Knowledge and Reduce Stigma Among Hispanic Adults

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMIGRANT AND MINORITY HEALTH
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages 398-406

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10903-012-9623-5

Keywords

Hispanic; Depression; Fotonovela; Stigma; Knowledge; Attitudes; Intentions; Health disparities; Health literacy; Narrative

Funding

  1. NCATS NIH HHS [UL1 TR000130] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMHD NIH HHS [L60 MD001850] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIMH NIH HHS [R25 MH080916] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fotonovelas-small booklets that portray a dramatic story using photographs and captions-represent a powerful health education tool for low-literacy and ethnic minority audiences. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a depression fotonovela in increasing depression knowledge, decreasing stigma, increasing self-efficacy to recognize depression, and increasing intentions to seek treatment, relative to a text pamphlet. Hispanic adults attending a community adult school (N = 157, 47.5 % female, mean age = 35.8 years, 84 % immigrants, 63 % with less than high school education) were randomly assigned to read the fotonovela or a low-literacy text pamphlet about depression. They completed surveys before reading the material, immediately after reading the material, and 1 month later. The fotonovela and text pamphlet both produced significant improvements in depression knowledge and self-efficacy to identify depression, but the fotonovela produced significantly larger reductions in antidepressant stigma and mental health care stigma. The fotonovela also was more likely to be passed on to family or friends after the study, potentially increasing its reach throughout the community. Results indicate that fotonovelas can be useful for improving health literacy among underserved populations, which could reduce health disparities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available