3.8 Article

Occurrence and Predictors of Vacuum and Forceps Used Sequentially for Vaginal Birth

Journal

JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages 317-322

Publisher

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30958-0

Keywords

Vacuum extraction; forceps; predictors

Funding

  1. Ontario Women's Health Council-Institute of Gender and Health of Canadian Institutes of Health Research Mid Career Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Sequential use of vacuum and obstetric forceps for vaginal delivery is associated with increased risks of adverse maternal and infant outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study to estimate the frequency of sequential use of vacuum and forceps for planned vaginal delivery and to identify predictors, using data collected in Ontario between 2004 and 2007. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to estimate the adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of predictors of sequential use of vacuum and forceps. Results: Of 186 988 pregnant women with a singleton, vertex presentation at term and a planned vaginal birth, 1062 (0.57%) required the sequential use of vacuum and forceps for delivery. The major predictors for sequential use of vacuum and forceps were mother's primary language being other than English or French, nulliparity, a history of Caesarean section, dystocia, use of epidural or other pain relief, labour induction, labour augmentation, fetal macrosomia, and advanced gestational age. Conclusion: In this population-based study we found that 0.57% of planned vaginal births were delivered with sequential use of vacuum and obstetric forceps. Abnormal labour, fetal macrosomia, language barriers, and advanced gestational age are significant predictors of requiring this sequential use.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available